The prolonged delay in the confirmation of Engr. Abdullahi Garba Ramat as Chairman of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) undermines these principles of natural justice and equity. Why? It has been more than four months since President Bola Ahmed Tinubu nominated Engr. Ramat. He has undergone screening by the Senate and, by every legal and professional standard, fulfilled the requirements of the position. Yet, vested interests have kept his confirmation in limbo.
The Senate Committee on Power—after a thorough, transparent, and bipartisan screening—unanimously cleared him. Their report, recommending his confirmation, was duly transmitted to the Senate leadership over a month ago. Accordingly, the Senate Order Paper of October 22 clearly listed his confirmation as an item for deliberation and adoption. For reasons known only to political bad behaviour, that item was abruptly stepped down.
Reasonable Nigerians are now asking essential questions:
1. Can the Senate leadership, by its singular discretion, refuse to present a committee’s report for adoption?
2. Should the personal grievances or political interests of a few individuals override the collective decision of a properly constituted Senate Committee?
Although the law does not specify a strict timeframe within which the Senate must conclude its confirmation process, the principles of fairness and administrative justice require that such processes be concluded within a reasonable period. It is therefore unjust—and indeed inequitable—for Engr. Ramat’s confirmation to be subjected to delay without explanation.
If there are new petitions or complaints, submitted after his screening, the Senate has every right to investigate them tho
